Comparison with Hemostatic Devices After Percutaneous Transradial Coronary Intervention to Reduce Radial Artery Occlusion

This abstract has open access
Abstract Summary
Abstract ID :
HAC987
Submission Type
Presentation Upload :
If the file does not load, click here to open/download the file.
Authors (including presenting author) :
Perry Lee, Chan TW, Lau YY, Kwok MK, John Wong
Affiliation :
Coronary Care Unit, Tseung Kwan O Hospital
Introduction :
Compared with transfemoral approach of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), transradial approach is much safer and offers more benefit to patients. A meta-analysis review showed a 73% reduction in major bleeding of transradial approach compared with transfemoral approach. Transradial approach can demonstrate cost effectiveness and improvement in patient comfort. In year of 2016-17, transradial approach was used in 80% of PCI patients in Tseung Kwan O Hospital. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the most widely discussed complication of transradial approach. Prolonged compression from hemostatic compression device is one of the factors causing occlusion. In this project, TR-band and Stepty-P were used to achieve wound hemostasis. Assessment was made whether TR-band could reduce RAO.
Objectives :
The primary objectives of this project are to (1) assess local vascular complications when hemostasis devices were applied; (2) evaluate the time taken for complete hemostasis and (3) evaluate the devices impact on patient comfort.
Methodology :
This was a prospective randomized study and PCI patients were assigned to use one of hemostatic compression devices - TR band and Stepty-P. Radial artery patency was evaluated at 24-hour using a reverse Barbeau test utilizing plethysmographic and pulse oximetry evaluation. Outcome assessment included the time taken for complete hemostasis of two hemostatic compression devices at the access site. A verbal pain intensity scale was used for evaluation of patient’s pain level when hemostatic device was applied.
Result & Outcome :
From May to August 2017, 95 PCI patients were randomized to use TR-Band and Stepty-P for hemostatic devices. None of the patients using TR-Band developed RAO while RAO was developed in three patients using Stepty-P after post-PCI 24-hour. Although there was no significant difference between both groups on time taken to hemostasis, seven patients in Stepty-P group developed bleeding or hematoma formation and three patients in TR-Band group were reported only. Five and four patients in Stepty-P group reported severe pain and very severe pain in pain intensity scale assessment respectively. Three patients with TR-Band reported moderate pain. Use of TR-Band for percutaneous transradial coronary intervention is an effective way to achieve wound hemostasis. It can reduce an incidence rate of RAO. TR-Band was also better tolerated by patients on verbal pain intensity scale assessment.
ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSE

Similar Abstracts by Type

Abstract ID
Abstract Title
Abstract Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
HAC720
Clinical Safety and Quality Service I
HA Staff
Maria SINN Dr
HAC456
Enhancing Partnership with Patients and Community
HA Staff
Donna TSE
HAC1262
Enhancing Partnership with Patients and Community
HA Staff
S F LEE Dr
HAC997
Clinical Safety and Quality Service II
HA Staff
K L CHAN